Another four British soldiers killed in Afghanistan, one believed to be a woman – the first to be killed in this theatre. A fifth soldier was wounded and is in a stable condition.
There is a brief report on the MoD website, a longer one on The Daily Telegraph site and the news is carried by many other media sources.
It is the DT, however, that tells us that the soldiers were killed by a "roadside bomb" (The BBC says it was a mine) while travelling in a "Snatch" Land Rover, "a vehicle originally designed for use in Northern Ireland."
Such vehicles, says the paper, have been repeatedly criticised for the poor defence they offer against roadside bombs compared to more heavily armoured alternatives. It adds: "It is thought they may have been using the vulnerable vehicle to keep a low profile and that the woman soldier, who was serving with the Intelligence Corps, may have been taken along in case female suspects had to be searched." However, the BBC reports that that the patrol was setting up a vehicle checkpoint.
For weeks now, diverse newspapers (and the BBC) have been reporting on how the Taleban were changing their tactics, resorting more to IEDs and mines, something that was reported over a year ago and predicted by us in June 2006 – almost two years to the day.
As to the "Snatch" Land Rover, yesterday when we received the reports of the deaths was the second anniversary of our post, pointing out the dangerous vulnerability of these vehicles.
There is, therefore, no excuse, no excuse at all. For two years (well over, in fact), the MoD and the Army have known that "Snatch" Land Rovers are entirely unsuitable for counterinsurgency operations, and they have had two years warning that the Taleban were going to adopt ambush tactics using bombs and mines.
The answer was then and is now, what have come to be known as MRAPs – Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles. At the Eurosatory exhibition yesterday, it was clear that militaries throughout the world have got the message … a small sample of MRAPs seen yesterday follows (and yes, one is a "Panther - even that is better than a "Snatch" if used as an ordinary patrol vehicle).
That we have not enough of them, and are still using "Snatch" Land Rovers, is inexcusable. The people, at all levels, who were involved – by act of default – in failing properly to equip our Army are in part responsible for sending these four soldiers to their deaths. They are stupid, malign fools.







COMMENT THREAD
Labels
- Abu Naji (16)
- Afghan history (13)
- Afghanistan (89)
- Ainsworth (26)
- air power (1)
- airlift (1)
- al Amarah (55)
- al-Qaeda (1)
- Anthony King (1)
- Anthony Loyd (6)
- AP (1)
- Apache (35)
- Arbuthnot (10)
- armoured bulldozer (2)
- arms smuggling (1)
- AT-6 (2)
- Baluchistan (1)
- Basra (145)
- Bastion (1)
- Battle of Britain (2)
- Beaver (4)
- Bechcraft RC-12 (6)
- Blackhawk (6)
- Boeing (1)
- British politics (1)
- Buffalo (30)
- bulldozer (5)
- Bushmaster (27)
- C-RAM (12)
- Cameron (37)
- Canadian (1)
- Caribou (1)
- Carriers (36)
- Carswell (1)
- casualties (2)
- Chinook (25)
- Churchill (1)
- convoys (105)
- Cordesman (1)
- coroner (1)
- corruption (2)
- Cougar (56)
- counter-insurgency (1)
- Coyote (12)
- D-9 (2)
- Daily Mail (57)
- Daily Telegraph (161)
- Dannatt (51)
- David Cameron (1)
- defence (3)
- Defence Committee (1)
- defence spending (2)
- Des Browne (75)
- diggers (1)
- donkeys (1)
- Doug Beattie (1)
- economics (1)
- elections (2)
- engineers (1)
- equipment (1)
- eric joyce (1)
- ERRF (19)
- Estonia (1)
- EU foreign policy (1)
- Eurofighter (55)
- European Defence Agency (18)
- F-35 (1)
- fatalities (3)
- finances (1)
- FRES (120)
- FRES. home front (1)
- Frontline Club (2)
- Gates (1)
- Gen Houghton (1)
- Gen John Craddock (4)
- General MacKay (1)
- generals (2)
- Gerald Howarth (37)
- Germany (1)
- Gordon Brown (2)
- Griffin (1)
- Gurkha (1)
- Guthrie (2)
- helicopters (189)
- Hercules (35)
- Hermes 450 (9)
- home front (4)
- House of Commons (1)
- Huey (3)
- Husky (26)
- IEDs (131)
- India (1)
- Inge (1)
- Iran (1)
- Iraq (133)
- ISTAR (12)
- Jackal (63)
- Jackson (3)
- Jeremy Clarkson (2)
- John Redwood (1)
- Kajaki (1)
- Karzai (3)
- Kashmir (1)
- kiowa (5)
- kuchi (1)
- land rover (1)
- Liam Fox (66)
- liberal intervention (1)
- LRDG (5)
- Lynx (64)
- Mallinson (1)
- Marder (1)
- Mastiff (141)
- Mayall (1)
- McChrystal (18)
- media (16)
- Mercer (22)
- Merlin (34)
- Mhadi Army (21)
- Mi-26 (19)
- Mi-8 (18)
- Michael Clarke (1)
- Michael Evans (2)
- Michael Yon (5)
- militias (1)
- mine roller (2)
- Ministry of Defeat (2)
- mobility (93)
- MoD (1)
- mortar attacks (28)
- MRAPs (68)
- mullahs (1)
- Muqtada al-Sadr (1)
- Musa Qala (54)
- NATO (1)
- Nimrod (40)
- Northern Ireland (1)
- Now Zad (11)
- Obama (7)
- Oman (1)
- opium (2)
- OV-10 Bronco (1)
- Pakistan (52)
- Panther (59)
- Philippson (7)
- Phoenix (15)
- Pilatus Porter (6)
- Pinzgauer (1)
- pioneers (1)
- plant (1)
- Pookie (4)
- Predator UAV (16)
- procurement (180)
- protection (1)
- public spending (1)
- Quentin Davies (2)
- RAF (2)
- RAF Regiment (2)
- RG-31 (84)
- Rhodesia (31)
- Richards (20)
- Richardson (4)
- Ridgeback (41)
- Rivet Joint (2)
- route clearance (26)
- Rupert Smith (1)
- Russian (1)
- Sadler (1)
- Saladin (1)
- Sangin (56)
- Saracen (3)
- security (1)
- Sentinel (5)
- Simon Jenkins (1)
- Skylink (2)
- Snatch (194)
- Spartan (12)
- Special Forces Support Group (1)
- Spectre (1)
- Stephen Farrell (1)
- Stephen Grey (15)
- Stirrup (27)
- strategy (19)
- Stuart Tootal (1)
- Sunday Times (1)
- surveillance (77)
- tactical mobility (1)
- Tactical Support Vehicle (1)
- Taleban (3)
- Talisman (8)
- Tellar (9)
- The Guardian (1)
- The Sun (3)
- The Times (2)
- Thorneloe (12)
- Tom Coughlan (1)
- Tony Blair (81)
- Tornado (1)
- Tucano (23)
- Twin Pioneer (1)
- UAVs (70)
- VBCI (7)
- Vector (88)
- Viking (59)
- war porn (1)
- Warrior (82)
- Warthog (2)
- Watchkeeper (13)
- Waziristan (2)
- wheat (8)
- Wimik (85)
- Winterton (77)
- withdrawal (1)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(175)
-
▼
June
(25)
- No celebrations yet
- Winning the war – Part I: The wrong solutions?
- Winning the war - Part II: Identifying the problem...
- Winning the war - Part III: Defining the need
- Winning the war - Part IV: The seeds of destructio...
- Winning the war - Part V: The military role
- Winning the war - Part VI: Fighting the peace
- Winning the war – Part VII: The only priority?
- Winning the war - Part VIII: Hearts and mines
- Winning the war - Part IX: Reality check
- Winning the war - Part X: Outsourcing the war
- Winning the war - Part XI: Vacuum at the centre
- Part XII: Putting it together
- Minister defends "Snatch" (badly)
- Stupid, malign fools
- The rise and fall of Gen. Dannatt
- The Ridgeback takes shape
- It's the balance, stoopid!
- Not good enough!
- The grim magic of numbers
- More on that turbulent CGS
- Who will rid me of this turbulent Chief of Staff?
- Mischief-making
- Tell it to the Marines!
- Problems stacking up …
-
▼
June
(25)
My Blog List
-
-
22 May SWJ Roundup2 hours ago
-
-
House FY14 Mark7 hours ago
-
-
-
CVF Video – Spot the Crane14 hours ago
-
Some more about Turkey1 day ago
-
-
A Farewell to Tanks4 weeks ago
-
Images of the Frontline Club Awards 20126 months ago
-
-
Okay, One Last Thought2 years ago
-
-
Advocating what?2 years ago
-
A Temporary Peace3 years ago
-